<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choosing between Dogmatism or Denial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webgambit.com/2009/11/09/choosing-between-dogmatism-or-denial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webgambit.com/2009/11/09/choosing-between-dogmatism-or-denial/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development from Karthik Hariharan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:11:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Web Gambit &#187; Comparing the Ruby and .NET ecosystems</title>
		<link>http://webgambit.com/2009/11/09/choosing-between-dogmatism-or-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>The Web Gambit &#187; Comparing the Ruby and .NET ecosystems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webgambit.com/?p=175#comment-125</guid>
		<description>[...] mentioned in my previous post that I believed much of the backlash against TDD is more technical in nature than many in the .NET [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentioned in my previous post that I believed much of the backlash against TDD is more technical in nature than many in the .NET [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthik Hariharan</title>
		<link>http://webgambit.com/2009/11/09/choosing-between-dogmatism-or-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthik Hariharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webgambit.com/?p=175#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Jim! I agree with everything you&#039;ve said and I&#039;ve been very impressed with the Rubyists attitude regarding unit testing. Let me know what you think of my follow up post here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://webgambit.com/2009/11/26/comparing-the-ruby-and-net-ecosystems/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://webgambit.com/2009/11/26/comparing-the-r...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Jim! I agree with everything you&#39;ve said and I&#39;ve been very impressed with the Rubyists attitude regarding unit testing. Let me know what you think of my follow up post here: <a href="http://webgambit.com/2009/11/26/comparing-the-ruby-and-net-ecosystems/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://webgambit.com/2009/11/26/comparing-the-r.." rel="nofollow">http://webgambit.com/2009/11/26/comparing-the-r..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Holmes</title>
		<link>http://webgambit.com/2009/11/09/choosing-between-dogmatism-or-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webgambit.com/?p=175#comment-124</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m late coming across your post, but I&#039;d be interested in what you find in the Rails community. Having been around a number of very accomplished Rubyists for some time, I can tell you their reaction to this silly angst we folks in the .NET domain have: they shake their heads and go back to doing TDD/BDD/context-driven development.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Neal Ford, Jim Weirich, Glenn Vanderburg, and less renowned but still highly accomplished Rubyists all have the same mindset. *NONE* of these folks put up with the attitude that it&#039;s OK to not test. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s no arguing about the value of tests because they understand it already. There&#039;s no heated debates about why one should test because they grok the benefits.  Best of all there&#039;s no religious wars about it because, for the most part, the attitudes of Rubyists just don&#039;t shake out like that. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s just how it is, and it&#039;s awfully refreshing -- because that mindset and approach to craftsmanship is simply just a part of how that community does its work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Of course there are segments of the Ruby community that don&#039;t work that way, but those segments are much smaller and much less vocal.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m late coming across your post, but I&#39;d be interested in what you find in the Rails community. Having been around a number of very accomplished Rubyists for some time, I can tell you their reaction to this silly angst we folks in the .NET domain have: they shake their heads and go back to doing TDD/BDD/context-driven development.</p>
<p>Neal Ford, Jim Weirich, Glenn Vanderburg, and less renowned but still highly accomplished Rubyists all have the same mindset. *NONE* of these folks put up with the attitude that it&#39;s OK to not test. </p>
<p>There&#39;s no arguing about the value of tests because they understand it already. There&#39;s no heated debates about why one should test because they grok the benefits.  Best of all there&#39;s no religious wars about it because, for the most part, the attitudes of Rubyists just don&#39;t shake out like that. </p>
<p>It&#39;s just how it is, and it&#39;s awfully refreshing &#8212; because that mindset and approach to craftsmanship is simply just a part of how that community does its work.</p>
<p>(Of course there are segments of the Ruby community that don&#39;t work that way, but those segments are much smaller and much less vocal.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
